Tag Archives: AI

Hungry Mungry

We borrow our title from a poem by Shel Silverstein, in which a boy sits down for a bowl of mushroom soup and proceeds to munch his way though his neighborhood, his town, his state, his country and the rest of the world; and who then decided, for dessert, to eat the universe:

According to Nicholas Carr, who has long understood the severe consequences of our insatiable appetite for technological “innovation”, so it goes with the relentless AI eating machine.

Below, we relay a few paragraphs from a recent post on his excellent New Cartographies.

Until, that is, there is nothing left to eat.

Not only a world without us.

Not only a universe without a world.

Just nothing was,

nothing was,

nothing,

nada,

nicht.

˜˜˜˜˜


Come the Early Rejecters

Here at DP, we are often accused of being Late Adopters. Not true; we are Early Rejecters!

For example, every member of the editorial staff at our vast mountainside scriptorium proudly carries an ancient flip phone and writes picture postcards to our global network of correspondents. Thus we shouted our collective affirmation upon reading a recent Earth Tongues posting by fellow Early Rejecter Eileen Crist, regarding use of AI.

The entire (concise & lucid) essay is worthy of close consideration; a brief excerpt below, with DP editorial emphasis in bold.

“The technosphere, defined as the total mass of all things manmade, now weighs more than all living things. It has taken over the face of the Earth and remains tenacious in its colonizing march. The technosphere has subjugated land, seas, and animals. It has smashed the atom, disassembled life, and projected itself into outer space. Now, the technosphere wants to take over, to replace, our thinking and our creative expressions; it so innocently offers to “assist in the content creation process.”

Methinks, NO. I do not want to know what AI “thinks.” I especially do not want AI to think or write for me. Additionally, I decide not to consider its input. This position is not motivated by prejudice against machines and by attachment to my cherished human distinction from them. Rather, in a world so slavish and reckless in every regard toward technology, with no evidenced capacity for either restraint or free choice, it behooves us to draw personal boundaries mindfully decided.”

 

 

˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜