The London Whale

It appears that a large mass of blubber has created a cephalopodic clot in the soul sucking sinkhole named JPM.  Star trader Bruno Iksil aka The London Whale “owned the spread” in a highly leveraged sovereign bond bet that failed to follow his gut, which soon became tripe tossed into the sea as shark chum. In these sorts of hedge fund feeding frenzies, the chum usually loses, and so it was for the London Whale.

THE LONDON WHALE

Last weekend, The New York Times published an investigation into the chain of command that would lead to this sort of wild gambling inside a bank that once upon a time was widely admired for its rigorous risk management. As if we needed further proof that reality will eventually humble all attempts at satire, the chain includes an Achilles (the Whale’s nominal supervisor) and a tick who bit the hand (or more likely the armpit) that fed all of them: chief investment office Ina Drew. We note that Ms. Drew has since announced her resignation, a departure that will be softened by a severance payment of $14.7 million.

The NYT report makes for entertaining reading, but begs the essential question: why was there ever such a creature as the London Whale swimming around inside a publicly subsidized commercial bank? James Rickards is the author of an extremely important book titled Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis, and a highly respected analyst of high finance sewage and those who produce it. In a recent commentary in U.S. News, Rickards writes:

As of this writing, Mr. Dimon has not resigned. Also as of this writing, his “known associate” Mr. Jon Corzine remains at large, floating like a jellyfish among the seaweed. PBS recently released an excellent report on what appears to be fraudulent malfeasance at the black hole formerly known as MF Global, under Corzine’s spectacularly inept and potentially criminal leadership:

We note a statistically significant overlay between the residential preferences of financial titans and the epidemiological hot zone for Lyme disease. Perhaps we shall see a variation on the “junk food” defense in future criminal investigations wherein those under indictment for the most outrageous financial fraud in history will contend that their judgement was severely impaired by Lyme disease, thus they are not responsible for their actions. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: the tick did it.

WHERE’S MY BONUS BITE?

These scandals are not isolated events, no more than the perverse scenarios that unfolded inside Abu Ghraib were the handiwork of a few “bad apples”. As Charles Ferguson puts it in this excerpt from his book Inside Job:

LONDON WHALE EATING BOAT FULL OF MUPPETS


The Crying of Lot 160

An item identified as a Ronald Reagan Blood Vial is presently on offer:

The seller helpfully includes a detailed narrative describing the item’s provenance:

“These articles have actually been in my family’s possession since 03/30/1981, the day that President Reagan was shot in Washington D.C. Back in the 70’s and 80’s, my mother worked for Bio Science Laboratories in Columbia, Maryland. Her laboratory was the laboratory contracted by Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well as the George Washington University Hospital to handle blood testing as well as other types of testing. Her lab did the blood work and testing for President Reagan. The test tube and the lab slip that I have are for his blood work to be tested for lead on [Monday] 03/30/1981. The testing was completed and the test tube was sitting on my mother’s desk. At the end of the week, she asked the director of her laboratory if she could keep the paper work and the test tube. The director of the lab told her no problem and really never gave it a second thought. It has been in my family ever since. My mother passed away back in November last year [2010] and my father passed away in January 2009. Prior to their passing, they knew that it was the only thing that I wanted with regards to their personal property or money that they accumulated over the years.”

Executive director of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation John Heubusch said, “If indeed this story is true, it’s a craven act and we will use every legal means to stop its sale or purchase.”

Seeking context for this little smear of Americana, we contacted our old friend Walter Sculley, the well known dealer in corporeal memorabilia. Speaking from his warehouse located somewhere in the Bahamas, he told us that while he did not have specific information about this particular item,  “there is enough Reagan assassination blood on the market to fill a bath tub”. He then commented that the stiff price being offered for a single vial was “hair-raisingly naive not to say bone stupid.” When pressed for an analysis as to who was likely doing the bidding, he said “DNA speculators, hedge funds, private equity, same old same old.”

Fragments of the bullets removed from the President are also “abundant”, according to the bone trader. “If you tried to reconstruct that bullet from the fragments that are floating around the marketplace, you’d have a projectile the size of a watermelon.” He also mentioned that “slivers of the Gipper’s polyp” dating from the 1980s were “more plentiful than splinters from the Old Cross”, while confessing that he has “never understood the Reagan end of the market.”

When asked to respond to the use of the word “craven” to describe such an auction, Sculley delivered the following riposte:

“Craven? What century is that guy living in? What’s ridiculous to me about this whole shebang, I mean Reagan was the great communicator about the unimpeachable virtues of the free market, right? So why not let the market decide what’s craven, and in any event, in case the guy at the foundation hasn’t noticed, craven sells, and sometimes craven sells in a super large way. Just ask what’s his name, that Facebook guy, he knows all about craven. I learned a thousand years ago, you can’t get all hot and bothered or queasy about what’s out there. Listen to the market, it will tell you who we are, not the other way around. With all due respect, Reagan would be spinning in his grave at the idea of lawyers getting involved in the sale of one measly little vial of dried blood.”

GOING ONCE GOING TWICE….


True Corruption

Corrupt enough to tell the truth?

On the first day of the trial for the former Serbian army commander Ratko Mladic, who faces eleven counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, we turn again to Gitta Sereny’s remarkable descent into the conscience of Franz Stangl, the former Kommandant of Sobibor and Treblinka. In the central chapters of her book Into That Darkness, Sereny attempts to bring some small measure of light to Stangl’s day-to-day conduct within the shadowlands of the extermination camps.

Ultimately, of course, we know (and she knows) that the simple fact that he was there at all is enough to condemn him. Yet Sereny digs deeper; to conduct a thorough examination of Stangl’s conscience, she needs to know the precise details of his conduct, as divulged through his own recollections, which she then meticulously weighs, measures and balances against the memories and testimony of camp survivors and other witnesses. In particular, Sereny wants to reconstruct specific situations in which his actions might have alleviated the suffering of his victims, and whether he might even have developed a semblance of connection or compassion regarding any of the “work-Jews”, some of whom he would see on a daily basis.

Thirty years after the publication of her book in 1974, Sereny recalled one of these exchanges, adding several important details not present in the book:Returning to Into That Darkness, we discover that Sereny expresses her assessment of this incident slightly differently, writing that this story offered the starkest example of a corrupted personality that she had ever encountered. She goes on to write:

Corrupt suggests not just rotten but also somehow broken (latin, rumpere); and Sereny means personality in the classical sense of that quality which must distinguishes an individual. So in this brief recollection we find Stangl’s personality – his voice, self and sounding; his pneuma, spirit and breath – manifesting the evidence of a collapsed moral consciousness, in which the most injurious and cruel twists of the knife are construed by the actor as gestures of kindness and mercy.

In May 2012, it is now Ratko Mladic who sits in the dock, ready to reveal his conscience and to express his personality. Will he prove corrupt enough, in Sereny’s sense, to tell the truth?


If You Are Human

CALL ME ISHMAEL BUT SAVE ME FIRST

In the final chapter of Moby Dick, Ishmael survives to tell the tale as the Pequod‘s lone survivor by clinging to Queequeg’s elaborately carved coffin:  ”Buoyed up by that coffin, for almost one whole day and night, I floated on a soft and dirge-like main. The unharming sharks, they glided by as if with padlocks on their mouths; the savage sea-hawks sailed with sheathed beaks. On the second day, a sail drew near, nearer, and picked me up at last.”

Ishmael’s savior turns out to be the whaleship Rachel, still searching for the lost son of her grief stricken Captain, a search that Ahab had refused to assist just a few days before. Now comes Adrian Vasquez, who has filed a lawsuit in Florida accusing Princess Cruises of negligence. Vasquez survived 28 days adrift in the Pacific on board Fifty Cent, his disabled ten foot fishing vessel. The ordeal included watching helplessly as his two friends and fellow fishermen died of dehydration and heat stroke.

CODE RED

On the sixteenth day, the three men spotted the cruise ship Star Princess, which they then vigorously flagged using a red sweater and orange flotation jackets. Two cruise passengers saw the distressed boat through their birding scopes, and immediately informed a cruise sales representative, who in turn assured them that the ship’s crew and Captain would be notified. However, the ship did not alter course, and made no effort to aid the distressed fishermen.

Article 98 of the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea clearly states:

Princess Cruises has subsequently claimed that the captain, was in fact not informed of the existence of the fishing boat:

“The preliminary results of our investigation have shown that there appeared to be a breakdown in communication in relaying the passenger’s concern. Neither Captain [Edward] Perrin nor the officer of the watch were notified. Understandably, Captain Perrin is devastated that he is being accused of knowingly turning his back on people in distress. Had the Captain received this information, he would have had the opportunity to respond.”

One of the birders, an American named Judy Meredith, attempted to contact the Coast Guard, but received no response. She later followed up with the cruise line and was told that the ship’s log had indeed recorded contact with nearby fishermen fearful for the safety of their nets. By this account, Star Princess then slightly adjusted her course to avoid the (nonexistent) nets, after which the fishermen waved their shirts in a gesture of gratitude.

Ms. Meredith refused to passively accept such astonishingly inept attempts to rewrite the narrative and will testify in support of the Vasquez lawsuit. Explaining her actions both on board the cruise ship and back on terra firma, she said: “If you are human, you do what you can.”

LAYERS OF THE FOOD CHAIN

While meditating upon the oceans of existential and political economic space separating the Star Princess from the Fifty Cent, we cannot help but to speculate whether the three young men on board the Fifty Cent were simply too far down the food chain for the Star Princess crew to perceive, indeed too insignificant to qualify as “persons in distress” worthy of the immediate assistance dictated by international maritime law. Since they were spotted through a passenger’s birding scope, well then perhaps they were just sea birds or other irrelevant beasts?

The two fishermen who died were named Fernando Osario (age 16) and Elvis Oropeza Betancourt. Panama is proceeding with a criminal investigation into the matter. One way or another, Adrian Vasquez will have his chance to tell the tale, and to seek compensation for the needless death of his two friends. If you are human, you do what you can.

VICTOR: I REQUIRE ASSISTANCE


Cronus With His Sickle

It appears that the vain quest for perpetual youth and immortality now includes the ingestion of a powder made from human babies. While contemplating the philosophical implications of such “health food”, we remembered a conversation many years ago with the famous purveyor of corporeal memorabilia Walter Sculley, and in particular his complaints (which seemed outrageous at the time) that so much quality material disappears from the memorabilia market straight into the digestive tracts of wealthy elders hankering for the vitality and priapic potency of days long gone.

Searching for some glimmer of illumination within the shadowlands of such a perverse scenario, we arranged a brief conversation with Mr. Sculley, who agreed to speak with us from an undisclosed location:

DP     A number of years ago, you complained in an interview about the impact of so-called specialty medicines on the corporeal memorabilia market. Now we hear news from South Korea about thousands of pills containing pulverized human flesh, allegedly manufactured in China from pulverized fetuses and babies.

WS     Yes, well everyone knows about the rhino horns and the panda livers and what not, and the same thing has been going on with human materials for as along as I’ve been in the business, more years than I care to remember.

DP     Specific examples?

WS     OK, just last year, a perfectly good clump of Marilyn Monroe hair was floating around the wholesale market. I was doing my due diligence preparing a bid, then some nut job nobody ever heard of bought the clump, mixed it up with high fructose corn syrup, gelatin and other glop and then he churns up these batches of edible lozenges, sold them as Marilyn Love Drops or whatever. Well, maybe he was not such a nut job after all, because they sold for over a thousand a pop, and he made probably a few hundred of them, so that’s a hefty profit on a single clump of hair, no way he gets that kind of moolah from a legit collector.

DP     You sound upset about it….

WS     Yeah well the thing is, once you do that, it’s gone from the market for good, you can’t really pick it up again at the other end, if you know what I mean, so in terms of  market value, you have to consider that hair fully flushed. Now that’s a quality item, you could build a whole collection around a primo item like that. Very sad.

DP     So who are the buyers for this sort of thing, such as the Marilyn Love Drops?

WS     For the Monroe hair candy it’s men, maybe a few women, I mean I don’t have the invoices so I’m speculating here but I’m thinking it’s mostly men who want that little taste of intimate contact with her, and this is the only option that’s left until they cook up some sort of genetic resurrection, and rent her out by the night. You know, guys who wanted a tiny little suckle, and this little gum drop is as close as they’re ever gonna get. Other items, they’re looking for a little more punch in the pajamas, OK, and those little blue pills aren’t doing the job anymore, so they’ll pay a fortune for a JFK toenail or whatever, and chew on that for a while, and think they’re off to the races. Most of the time, it’s all in their heads, and the sad thing is if they would just whack a tennis ball around now and then, they might have the same effect but somehow they think, yeah, that JFK toenail, that’ll do the trick quite nicely, thank you very much.

DP     But it’s all in their heads.

WS     Yep. It’s like the relic is a trigger for the imagination, and the act of chewing pulls the trigger, then blam! they’re off to the races on a painted pony.

DP     In terms of long term trends, are you seeing more of this sort of ingestion of items that would normally be bought and sold as collectibles?

WS     Oh definitely. If not for performance pills, then for DNA speculation.

DP     What, you mean harvesting items just for the DNA?

WS     Yeah, that’s something that’s really spinning out of control. I mean there are even a few hedge funds set up, all chasing the same asset, celebrity DNA, so that the raw material is banked and ready, waiting for the science to catch up. Once that happens, presto chango, you pay the piper and you can have a baby Elvis or a baby God help us Kim Kardashian, or whoever you want.

DP     What’s your reaction to all that?

WS     It’s really depressing. I’m just glad I’m coming to the end of my career, because in a few years the memorabilia market will be ding dong kaput. I get contacted by young people wanting to intern here at the warehouse, learn the business, and I tell them forget about it, no future in the bone trade, poof.

DP     Any comment specifically about the pills filled with pulverized Chinese infants and fetuses?

WS     Horrific. I mean, what else can I say? I’ll tell you this, though – it looks like an extreme case and it turns my stomach, but let me ask you, isn’t it just a sign of the times everywhere?

DP     I’m not sure I understand.

WS     OK, as you know, I left the USA years ago because I just got fed up with the whole stinking enchilada, but I still consider myself a patriot. Shoot, I named my own private collection “Bones of the Founding Fathers”, so you can see where I’m coming from. Isn’t eating babies pretty much what we’re doing in terms of all the debt, spending the future? Sending young people off to ridiculous wars while the old codgers flip through the pages of their portfolios, same deal there, too. Might as well eat them when they’re born, get it over with from the get go.

DP     Those are harsh words…

WS     Harsh? I don’t think so. I mean, think of those kids who got pepper sprayed,  splashed full in the face, coated with the stuff. I saw that and I remember thinking damn, won’t be long before the fat cats get to slicing up those kids for pepper pot soup, and that’s no joke. So before anyone gets bent out of shape talking about the barbarian Chinese and all, I recommend taking a long hard look in the mirror.

Cronus Sits Down For Supper


Luftschiff Hindenburg

May 6, 2012 marks the 75th anniversary of the Hindenburg disaster, which resulted in thirty six fatalities, including one member of the ground crew. Courtesy of the richly informative airships.net, we submit the following profile for the enormous airship, with a volume exceeding that of the Titanic:

MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE FOR THE HINDENBURG OMEN

The Smithsonian National Postal Museum has organized an exhibition titled Fire & Ice that assembles various artifacts from the Hindenburg and Titanic disasters, including a promotional brochure for swift trans-Atlantic air travel, together with numerous pieces of airmail that failed to reach their intended recipients:

R-101 Tour of Inspection

Of particular interest to us here at Desperado Philosophy: the curious provenance and itinerary of the duralumin used for the Hindenburg’s construction. It seems that 5000 kilograms of the metal were purchased by the Germans as salvage from the wreckage of the British airship R-101, which crashed on October, 1930 in Beauvais, abruptly terminating its maiden voyage as a commercial enterprise. Duralumin from the Hindenburg wreckage was then salvaged once again, shipped to Germany and used in the construction of aircraft for the Luftwaffe. The fate of those aircraft is unknown, though it is not inconceivable that the duralumin returned to British soil.

Blünthner Schweinpiano

Also made from duralumin: a piano, manufactured by the Blüthner pianofabrik. Interestingly, the piano was covered with pale pigskin, intended to slightly muffle the tone while also eliminating reflective glare.

Though a fixture in the airship’s passenger lounge on numerous transatlantic voyages, the pig-piano was not on board the Hindenburg on the day of the disaster, having been placed on display at the Blüthner factory in Liepzig, where it was destroyed in 1943 by a British bombing raid. At the time, the factory was producing ammunition boxes, and not pianos, a tactical retooling implemented by authority of the Minister of Armaments, Albert Speer.

LOUNGE MUSIC FOR A NAZI  ZEPPELIN

Finally, we note the use of the Hindenburg as an aerial ornament within the pageantry of the Nuremburg rally on September 14, 1936; the zeppelin appeared over the congress on the final day, following a formation of conventional aircraft that had been organized into a swastika formation. We also note that a tiny remnant of the Nazi insignia on the Hindenburg is available for sale on Ebay.

TRIUMPH OF THE WILL AS A HYDROGEN BOMB

ALL THAT IS SOLID MELTS INTO AIR


The Answer My Friend

BLOOD LANE

Chapter 44 of Moby Dick finds Ahab in his cabin, fighting a vicious headache. Having announced the target of his predation to the Pequod’s crew, he now suffers from the inescapable fact that he cannot specify where Moby Dick rolls, sounds and wallows. At this moment, what heaps and tasks Ahab is not some abstract inscrutable malice but rather the whale’s carnal invisibility.

Even when given golden incentive through the doubloon nailed to the mast and entranced by their captain, the lookouts in the topmast can only scan a single migratory vein, with even such limited scrutiny possible only when weather conditions are optimal. The masts of the scattered fleet are not linked into a network of fixed haliographs, such as the one devised in a later decade by General Nelson Miles during his hunt for the most wicked indian who ever lived; nor are they able to transmit radiophonic signals, no matter how much lightning they may inadvertently conduct.

Unlike terrestrial hunting where the environment is stable and where the hunter might also remain silent and still while waiting for prey to roam into range, whaling is a hunt where all the variables are constantly in motion: the ocean is moving; the whales are in motion, sometimes with the currents, but often not; and the whale ship is in motion, too, dependent on winds that may or may not favor the systematic tracking of probable – but never definite – migratory patterns. Thus Ahab bends over his charts:

The charts store information about seasonal migrations and feeding patterns, and also identify specific sightings of Moby Dick, not only in his own past voyages but also those encounters recorded in the stories of his fellow captains in the whaling fleet. Sifting, weighing and balancing all these variables and probabilities inside his head, Ahab ultimately seeks to transform the pencilled vectors of his charts into a fountain of whale blood.

AHAB DECRYPTED

Let us now move away from the dark vortex of Ahab’s headspace and consider the shadowlands of our own national security obsessions, as represented in the vast surveillance octopus of the NSA. As described in an excellent Wired report, Stellar Wind is the catchy code name for the world’s largest data mine, now under construction in Bluffdale ,Utah.

BLOWING IN THE WIND

At the core of the project crunching the yottabytes will be the the world’s fastest supercomputer, generating so much heat that it will require 60,000 tons of cooling equipment, heat released by the creation of the most exhaustive behavioral map of a species ever conceived, a dynamic map that aims to capture every burp and twitch of the Naked Crowd. This lethal funnel of decryption and pattern analysis will eventually deliver an obliteration of individual privacy so thorough as to rip the notion of inalienable human rights from whatever remains of the American narrative, and leave us: where?

With a Stellar Wind blowing hard in our faces, we turn once again to Chapter 44, and to Ishmael’s astute diagnosis:

Eagle Mutation?


Sorry for the Inconvenience


On Wednesday, April 25, Slavoj Zizek delivered an address at The New York Public Library titled “The Year of Dreaming Dangerously”, a year that will apparently include publication of his new book, Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. On his publisher’s website, the book is described as a “long-awaited masterpiece”.  On the website of the New York Public Library, our tireless research staff found a prior reference to Zizek as “the Elvis of cultural theory”.

Unable to dispatch a reporter to attend his (sold out) lecture in person, we were grateful to find a synopsis published in the pages of The Guardian. In the midst of these remarks, he delivers the following caution to the Occupy movement:

Here at Desperado Philosophy, we have had a difficult time digesting this strangely paternalistic passage. Is he saying that anyone who attempts to raise issues of personal accountability is part of some vast Papist conspiracy of obfuscation? Is he saying that individual acts of resistance, truth telling and integrity are meaningless; that because “the system” propels us to be corrupt, our individual actions and attitudes are of no consequence? Far from Hegel, this sounds a good deal like the crude situationist reductionism of Philip Zimbardo, in which the problem of conscience is wormed from the turf.

Is Zizek then also saying that the Occupy movement lacks seriousness because certain participants may be present on the scene for reasons of pleasure, connection and community? What if the experiences he wrongly dismisses as “the carnival” are absolutely central to “how our daily life will be changed”? Has Elvis left the building? Or is he just having us on? We know that Zizek loves a good joke, and indeed he closes his remarks with the following:

All very clever and amusing, but what does it mean? Is he telling the Occupy movement, whose media innovations have included the ingenious human megaphone, that what they really need is a medium of coded subterfuge, the red ink of a nod and a wink? Why?

True, we have never really understood the Zizek phenomenon, though from time to time we venture into his copious textuality in search of clues for what it is all about. Here is one little nugget dug from his own preface to The Zizek Reader:

This peculiar and self-indulgent pronouncement left us so befuddled that we convened an emergency staff meeting to meditate, mutatis mutandis, upon the fate of Paulinian materialists, wherever they may be. Yet this is the very same fellow who cautions the mostly anonymous participants in the purposefully leaderless Occupy movement not to fall in love with themselves? Sigh. (And could someone please email us an explication of  Zizekian “good terror”?)

By contrast, on Sunday, April 22, Earth Day at Vermont’s Putney School, we attended a rather different sort of lecture, given by a different sort of man named Tom Wessels, whose subtle and profound books have nothing to do with wielding Lacanian tools to reactualize German Idealism. Wessels, who exudes the sort of joyful wisdom that comes from a lifetime spent in forests and in the mountains rather than at academic conferences and symposia mulling the End of Time and such, carried a rather different message.

Speaking without notes and entirely without pretense, Wessels urged the assembled Putney students, among whose ranks one would undoubtedly find delegates to OWS, to choose a life story of connection rather than consumption, and to choose commitment to community and the landscape over the narrow celebration of self. Referring to Black Elk Speaks, he pointed out that this New Story was in fact a very Old Story.

Since the prevailing story of consumption and possession of endless stuff is correlated with a high incidence of depression and anxiety often terminating in years of Lacanian analysis, Wessels also roundly endorsed having “a good time” while creating new forms of association and sustenance. Only through such good times can the Old/New Story gain heart, and life, and a future.

Though we neglected to bring our crack team of videographers to properly document the event, we discovered a video of the commencement  address given to the Antioch class of 2008, during which Wessels delivered essentially the same message, a message well worth repeating:

To close the afternoon, we then gathered around a piano to participate in one of the many beautiful rituals and traditions that make the school such a special place: sing. After having such a good time reconnecting with community and the landscape at Putney’s Earth Day carnival, we are confident that whatever future survives the present will be based in such joyful experiences, and not in the “good terror” of Slavoj Zizek.


The Willful Child

Many years ago, the distinguished German film maker Alexander Kluge brought to our attention a brief tale from the Brothers Grimm titled “The Willful Child” :

In German, the title is Das Eigensinnige Kind, and the etymologically complex concept of Eigensinn is central to Kluge’s nuanced, beautiful and therefore little known philosophy of history. Within this philosophy, the action and agency of the child’s buried arm offers far more significance than mother history’s punishing rod; all in good time.

Hans Magnus Enzensberger explores the tension between history and eigensinn in his extraordinary novel about the various modulations of resistance embodied by the family of Kurt Freiherr von Hammerstein-Equord during the years of the Third Reich, resistance that included espionage on behalf of the Red Army and the participation of two sons in Stauffenberg’s unsuccessful attempt to assassinate Hitler on July 20, 1944.

In a recent interview, Enzensberger explains, “Eigensinn is a word that doesn’t translate very well into English. It’s not selfishness. It’s not obstinacy. It’s not intransigence. You might say it’s a sense of having your own value system. That’s a quality that I find very interesting, because it’s almost beyond a person’s control. When I first came to England after the war, people used to speak of someone being a ‘man of character’: that might be a good translation. In spite of the pressures within his milieu, Hammerstein somehow didn’t budge. He couldn’t. It saved him from the opportunism of the other generals. Of course, they would have killed him off if he hadn’t died in 1943.”

In relation to our roaming investigations into the history and science of obedience, the person ‘of character’ might be described as an individual for whom there are no situational influences nor social expectations that will subsume her/his own conscience. As Enzensberger stresses, this is not a question of being stubborn or contrarian or merely idiosyncratic; rather, that certain behaviors and responses are simply not possible, entirely unscriptable for individuals endowed with abundant eigensinn. Such people are very difficult to transform into “agents” of another’s will, or to be sucked into fanatical movements, hysterias, security manias and other ideological delusions.

As Enzensberger writes about the aristocratic silence of the Hammersteins, “There remains an unspoken remainder which no biography is capable of unravelling; and perhaps it is precisely this remainder upon which everything depends.” During a time when the Naked Crowd remains ever ascendant, we pause to sing a hymn of quiet praise to that “unspoken remainder” and to the child’s arm pushing willfully through the dirt.

THE UNSPOKEN REMAINDER


Nothing to Hide

In his remarkably prescient book The Naked Crowd, published in 2004, law professor Jeffrey Rosen reports on an informal experiment conducted with groups of students and adults in the years following the events of 9/11. He asked them to imagine two machines designed to enhance public security at airports; a Naked Machine, which used microwaves to perform a virtual strip search, producing vividly naked three dimensional images of everyone who passed through the scanner, and a Blob Machine, which used simple software manipulation to extract images of any concealed objects from scanned bodies and project them onto a generic and sexless mannequin, creating “an unrecognizable and nondescript blob.”

Subjects were then given a hypothetical choice between the two machines, with all other factors – such as the length of the security queues – being equal. Rosen found a fairly consistent stream of people who preferred to go through the more invasive Naked Machine, with some describing “a willingness to be electronically stripped by the Naked Machine as a ritualistic demonstration of their own purity and trustworthiness in much the same way that religiously devout describe rituals of faith.”

(As a brief digression, this psychological dynamic might also help to explain the behavior of sexual assault victim Louis Ogborn beneath the golden arches, who in the early stages of her ordeal seemed so eager to demonstrate she literally had nothing to hide, and thus complied with the perverse directives of the disembodied ventriloquist Officer Scott and his depraved puppets, within months of the publication of Rosen’s The Naked Crowd.)

Crowds suspect individuals who stand apart, and if the crowd wants to be naked, then the individual who expresses a preference for privacy is immediately suspect. A number of years ago, I was asked in a public forum why I did not have any social media accounts. I responded that I did not want to subject myself to data mining; that social media were an extractive industry, not dissimilar to whaling in the nineteenth century; that I was unwilling for my patterns of curiosity, as reflected in daily community interactions or web navigations, to become part of a deeply camouflaged behavioral algorithm which would then be packaged and sold to marketers without any compensation to me, as the mine; and that future potential uses of such data for social manipulation and control were still unknown. My explanation for why I had “opted out” was greeted with considerable dismay and a touch of suspicion, with one person blurting out that “you only have to worry about privacy if you have something to hide.” Oh really?

FACEBOOK ACCOUNT PROTOTYPE

Rosen has the rare sort of fluid intelligence that combines the analytical precision of a legal scholar with subtle insight into the vagaries of mass psychology; his most provocative arguments concern the collapse of boundaries between the individual and the crowd in a media environment dominated by the internet.Law professor Noah Feldman made a similar point in the wake of the recent supreme court decision on whether police have the right to conduct strip searches, even for the most trivial misdemeanor such as violating a leash law or a minor traffic ticket:Reviel Netz’s idea of history as a wrestling match speaks to this posture: mammals and other living beings wrestling with each other in a confined and finite space open to constant negotiation and contestation. Yet there is a second wrestling match transpiring simultaneously, the match between the body of the Naked Crowd (that may transform into a bloodthirsty mob at any moment) and the body of the fully clothed and self-reliant individual, who stands apart, or wriggles free from the choke hold. We know, or should know from long history, that when the body of the Naked Crowd takes complete control of the ring, with the individual down and out for the count, the result does not tend to be touchy-feely Communitas.

Should we not carefully consider exactly who benefits when privacy mutates from an inalienable human right into a suspect form of “hiding”?  In his shameless promotion of the Naked Machine, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff is one obvious beneficiary, though as Chris Hedges recently documents, the ascendence of the Naked Crowd has unleashed a vast new architecture for the military-industrial complex. Once the infrastructure for total information awareness is in place, it will not be long before loose talk about privacy as an intrinsic quality of human liberty will be considered not just eccentric, but criminal.

SLEEPING HAMMOCK FOR THE NAKED CROWD


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.