Tag Archives: naomi klein

Labour of Care

The problem on the unsinkable Titanic was not zero lifeboats. For sure, there were not enough of them; after all, the Titanic had been certified as unsinkable, thus why waste money and space on lifeboats?

Yet the real problems were: unequal access to those lifeboats that were on board; lack of training for how to lower those lifeboats safely into the sea; lack of training for how to cope with the panic of a disaster while trying to organize an emergency evacuation; lack of proper supplies stored within the lifeboats, together with the lack of trained crew to manage the boats, the supplies and the survivors, under extreme stress.

Let’s call all of the above: Lifeboat Justice. Now comes shock doctrine & disaster capitalism expert Naomi Klein with salient comments on what justice means within the context of a climate emergency, as relayed from a recent interview. Archival images added by DP.

 

 

 

[…]

 

[…]

 

DP takeaway:

Lifeboat Justice will emerge from the struggle for Climate Justice within the emergency, as it deepens and unfolds.

 

˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

 


The Untouchables

Now comes Naomi Klein with a lucid analysis of one possible though not inevitable outcome from the Age of Covid-19, a post-pandemic shock doctrine that would retrospectively confirm Black Mirror as an anticipatory documentary rather than an exercise in the dystopian imagination.

The entire essay is worth close consideration; a brief excerpt below, with an image (caption added by DP) from the studio of Jakub Geltner.

 

FLOCK DOCTRINE

 

˜˜˜˜˜

Thus at exactly the time when we need to connect more deeply to the realities of the natural world, while also connecting with each other in more compassionate and immediate ways, the hubristic pseudo-titans of Silicon Valley invite us into a world of perpetual surveillance, behavioral algorithms and learned helplessness.

After all this grief and suffering, they propose to accelerate the Great Acceleration to warp speed, an appropriate tempo for such a warped, narcissistic and nihilistic vision. Shaped by terror of fleeting mortality, their wish to live in an untouchable world discloses a puerile refusal to acknowledge limits. At a time when we humans need to do (and be) less and then less again, their shallow understanding insists on more always more.

This too shall crash.

˜˜˜˜˜˜


Rage Against the Elites

Among the hundreds of commentaries churning Tuesday’s bitter butter, two stand out for DP consideration, the first from Naomi Klein, with its core argument excerpted below:

nk1

nk2

exib1_-john-leech

HISTORICAL ROOTS FOR A BLEEDING EDGE PLATFORM COMPANY

˜˜˜˜

Next we have The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald, in an analysis that echoes his previous dissection of the Brexit “surprise”:

gg1

gg2

wake-up


Sacrifice Zones

Now comes Naomi Klein, with excerpts from an excellent recent essay that explores the relationships among climate change, fossil fuels and violence by way of revisiting certain ideas expressed in the past by Edward Said, regarding the limitations of environmentalism. The images are from the richly recycled oil cans exhibited within the online gallery of Cal Lane.

nk1

 

cl1

 

nk2

 

cl4

 

nk3

 

cl3

 

nk4

 

cl6

 

nk5

For those who – perversely enough – continue to beat the [oil] drum of America’s “greatness”, let us keep firmly in mind that such ephemeral greatness has been achieved largely through cultural genocide; desecration of the landscape; the destruction of worker lungs and bodies; and the global export of our most precious “service”: violence.

What would it mean if we were to choose instead to become, as Klein suggests, great ancestors?